A graphic of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the interbank federal funds rate.
(Graphics/Reuters)Many libertarians also contend that the Federal Reserve Act is unconstitutional. Congressman Ron Paul (ranking member of the House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy), for example, argues that:"The United States Constitution grants to Congress the authority to coin money and regulate the value of the currency. The Constitution does not give Congress the authority to delegate control over monetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, the Constitution certainly does not empower the federal government to erode the American standard of living via an inflationary monetary policy."
Ron Paul has also criticized Federal Reserve policy for creating and downplaying excessive inflation: This decline in the value of the dollar is simple to explain. The dollar loses value as the direct result of the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury increasing the money supply. Inflation, as the late Milton Friedman explained, is always a monetary phenomenon. The federal government consistently wants to spend more than it can tax and borrow, so Congress turns to the Fed for help in covering the difference. The result is more dollars, both real and electronic-- which means the value of every existing dollar goes down...when the Fed sets interest rates artificially low, the cost of borrowing becomes cheap. Individuals incur greater amounts of debt, while businesses overextend themselves and grow without real gains in productivity. The bubble bursts quickly once the credit dries up and the bills cannot be paid...the Fed steadily increased the monetary supply throughout the 1990s by printing money. Recent Fed numbers show double-digit annual increases in the M2 money supply. These new dollars may make Americans feel richer, but the net result of monetary inflation has to be the devaluation of savings and purchasing power.
Readers of this blog may have noted that I have been inclined to give Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Federal Reserve Banks the benefit of the doubt in the bail out of Bear-Stearns, Countrywide Financial and other large investment banks deeply invested in sub-prime lending. I was inclined to trust the Fed. Further research and study now impels me to side with Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, Depression era Congressman Louis T. McFaddin and former GOP Presidential contender Congressman Ron Paul and all other Libertarian leaning Americans in opposition to the Federal Reserve Banks as both unconstitutional and damaging to the American people. In my opinion, the Constitutional principle of "limited government" securing personal liberties, responsibilities and opportunities for it's citizens instead of subsidies, entitlements and nine trillion dollar debt, is the salvation of America, which means among many other things the abolishing of the Federal Reserve Banks. Don't trust the Fed!
I seem to remember a post that was titled "Trust The Fed", authored by you.
You are a political chameleon. Do you know what color you are today?
You are right Ron, that "Trust The Fed" post has received over a thousand
hits but that is irrelevant. As I pointed out, further study and research
has lead me to see the Fed in a different light. I changed my mind on the
matter of the Fed, simple as that. Call me a "political chameleon" or a
"flip-flopper" or whatever. Providence has given us a mind and the feedom
to change our mind and I feel good about that!
Oh, of course you can change your mind. And you are doing research
now-something I've recommended to you before. I guess eventually you'd have
done it without me after getting burned by media spin once too often.As for
the Fed, it doesn't matter any more. The economy is fucked no matter which
way you look-housing bubble, Dow falling like a rocket propelled bowling
ball, dollar weakening, debt ballooning, and countries beginning to wonder
if a basket of currencies minus the dollar would be a safer investment.
Thanks alot, Chimpy!