"PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"

Thomas Jefferson

"WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL; THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS; THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"
AbeBooks.com - Passion for Books Logo (125x125)

My Belief System & Profile

Belief System Use

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License.

Yahoo Personals

Create a FREE Profile
Shop at Samsclub.com (125x125)

Calendar

««Dec 2008»»
SMTWTFS
 
1
23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031

Tag Cloud

                                                           
LinkShare  Referral  Prg

State Of The Blog

  • 2 yrs 19 wks 6 days old
  • Updated: 2 Dec 2008
  • 670 entries
  • 611 comments

Blog Hits

Total: 981,265
since: 15 Jul 2006
PCSecurityShield

RSS Feeds Rock!

 Subscribe in a reader

McAfee, Inc

Mailing List

Add to Technorati Favorites
Join My Community at MyBloglog!

Quick Poll

Will the Barack Obama Administration more likely promote.....
socialist Federal government contol?
fascist banks and corporations control?
populist trade unions control?
globalist United Nations control?
constitutionalist Bill Of Rights control?

Quick Poll Comments

~ Mo'thanksin ~
Based on Obama's voting for the TARP and his economic advisors and cabinet picks, Obama will more than likely promote a fascist banks and corporations controlled US.

Wirefly - Find the Perfect Cell Phone
Blog Directory
blogarama - the blog directory
 
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” - Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950 "We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly-knit highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." John F. Kennedy

"Information is the currency of democracy." Thomas Jefferson

"A NEWS AND MEDIA BLOG IN THE CIVIL LIBERTIES TENOR WITH LIMITED GOVERNMENT OVERTONES, FACILITATING THE FLOW OF IDEAS, INFORMATION, E-COMMERCE AND INSPIRATION WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF NET NEUTRALITY"
The Gross National Debt:
"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." John Adams "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is - The Fed has usurped the government!!” - Congressman Louis T. McFadden “Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States.” - Barry Goldwater

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth.....

is a revolutionary act." (George Orwell)

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"Four More Years Of The Bush Agenda?"

posted Sun, 10-05-08

President Bush shakes hands with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson at the AP Photo/Charles Dharapak

Even with the $700 billion bailout, the financial crisis and fragile economy promise to loom large over the opening days of the next administration.

Obama acknowledges "the next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals." Yet neither camp is eager to say precisely what changes might have to be made — promises broken or delayed.

Obama's running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, was questioned about that in Thursday's vice presidential debate. He could list only a few: cutting wasteful spending and "we might have to slow down a commitment we made to double foreign assistance."

His GOP counterpart, Sarah Palin, was asked if there was any campaign promise she would have to take off the table because of the financial crisis. "There is not," she said.

Newly elected presidents have a good track record in winning approval of major tax bills and other legislation in their first year in office.

The next president probably will lay out an ambitious agenda, possibly soon after the election and amid great constraints: the financial crisis and a rising budget deficit projected by the Congressional Budget Office to reach a record $438 billion next year — and that's before figuring in the bailout's first-year cost.

Central to the nominees' tax proposals is that an array of Bush tax cuts are due to expire in 2010.

McCain would keep tax rates low for everybody, including higher-income people. For companies, he would slash them from the current 35 percent to 25 percent, arguing it is the best way to jolt the economy and create jobs.

Obama, who says his program would most help the squeezed middle class, would retain Bush tax cuts for families making less than $250,000 a year and individuals making less than $200,000. He would do away with them for people above those levels.

The Illinois senator also has proposed raising the top marginal income-tax rate, now 35 percent, to 39.6 percent, and raising the current 33 percent rate to 36 percent. The money raised from tax increases on the wealthy would be redirected by Obama to tax relief for lower-income people.

Under Obama's approach, the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers, those making roughly $600,000 or more, would see their taxes go up on average by $93,709 in 2009, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, because Obama would begin putting in place the changes before the scheduled expiration of the Bush cuts.

For McCain, those same wealthy taxpayers would see an average reduction of $48,860, reflecting in part additional cuts he is proposing.

By contrast, the bottom 20 percent of taxpayers, with taxable income of roughly $19,000 per year or less, would see their taxes cut by an average of $567 under Obama's program and $21 under McCain's plan, the tax center estimates.

For the 20 percent of taxpayers in the middle, making roughly between $37,600 and $66,400, the tax break would be $1,118 under the Obama plan and $325 under the McCain plan in 2009, according to the center's analysis.

Obama would raise the top rate on capital gains and dividend income, now 15 percent, to 20 percent for families making over $250,000. McCain would keep both at 15 percent.

Obama has proposed excluding people age 65 and older from federal income tax liability if they earn $50,000 or less, along with creating a new tax credit of up to $1,000 for lower- and middle-income families ($500 for individuals) to offset federal payroll taxes.

McCain wants a 15 percent federal estate tax rate and a $5 million exemption. Obama has suggested a 45 percent federal estate tax rate and a $3.5 million exemption amount.

Obama offers expanded renewable energy and conservation tax incentives and a repeal of tax incentives for oil and gas companies. He supports energy rebates for individuals to help offset the home-heating costs.

McCain has proposed an end to ethanol subsidies and discussed a federal gas tax holiday.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a top McCain economic adviser, said McCain is standing by his tax-cut proposals for now.

"Historically, we never have sustained successful deficit reduction without strong economic growth. So he's put that first," Holtz-Eakin said. Furthermore, "John McCain is running on a platform that does not include massive increases in spending," he said.

McCain also has indicated he is considering putting a complete cap and freeze on discretionary, nonmilitary and nonveterans' spending.

Of course, economic policy will be set not just by the new president but by the new Congress. Congress is in Democratic hands now, and Democrats are expected to increase their numbers in the November elections.

That could make it hard, if McCain is elected, for him to get his tax-cut proposals enacted.

"The reality of it is taxes will probably rise" no matter who is elected, said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com and an occasional McCain adviser. "It makes it a lot more difficult to cut taxes when you have big budget deficits."

Zandi thinks that the early days of the next presidency will be dominated by a lingering financial crisis and the need for "more government intervention, more legislation directly supporting housing and mortgage markets" beyond the $700 billion bailout.

Relief on Wall Street over the hard-won passage of a $700 billion bailout package for the financial system apparently hasn't yet trickled down to the pubs, storefronts, car lots and malls of Main Street.

Many Americans spent an uneasy weekend wondering whether the rescue would help in time — or at all — and trying to figure out where next to cut back as the economic screws tighten.

Would financing come through for the new washing machine? Could the old car hold out another year? Would a nice dinner out bust the budget?

"People are afraid," said Linda Morrow, who owns a shoe and handbag store in a Dallas mall. "People basically don't know what the future will bring. They're afraid to spend. They want to see what the bailout will do. They're waiting till after the election."

In more than two dozen interviews with The Associated Press across the country over the weekend, Americans described those concerns, from tighter personal credit to worries about small businesses to doubts about simply making ends meet.

     The Bush Administration has made it very hard for either Barack Obama or John McCain to implement their respective economic proposals because of the massive 700 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street. (I wonder did Obama and McCain think of that when they sheepishly voted for the Senate pork laden version of the original Henry Paulson version of the Wall Street bailout? I thought McCain hated earmarks?) Because of the current uncertainties Americans have about the US economy, consumers and investors are going to hold back on spending and investing. Banks are holding back on lending. Joblessness in America is increasing. Between Obama and McCain, whose economic policies are more likely to get the economy revived?

      Barack Obama's socialistic "wealth redistribution" tax policies will not encourage business investments by wealthy Americans, as I see it. If banks aren't lending and investors aren't investing then more jobs are lost for the working class Americans, who will then have to use their Obama tax rebates to pay for the necessities only, which will hurt many retail industries and businesses. As I see it, in the current US economic climate, no Americans should have their taxes raised. Spending will have to be cut back on an individual level as well as the governmental level. Ideally, withdrawing completely from Iraq and Afghanistan would free up billions of dollars for domestic and infrastructure spending, but we know that isn't going to happen in an Obama or McCain administration, as both candidates are totally committed to the imperialistic Bush Administration's so called War On Terror. Do you ever get the feeling that whether Obama or McCain gets elected, it will still be four more years of the Bush Administration's economic and foreign policy agenda?

tags:                      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



Current News & Views Search

Custom Search

GO TO MO'THANSKIN FRONT PAGE FOR LATEST & MOST READ BLOG POSTS,

PODCASTS, RSS FEEDS, VIDEOS, BOOK ROOM,

EDUCATIONAL & INSPIRATIONAL WEBPAGES!