"PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"

We Are All Mo'thanskin!

"WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL; THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS; THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"

"The answer to 1984 is 1776"

An electronic community for...

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

My Evolving Belief System & Profile

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
123
4
5
67
8
9
10
11
12
1314
15
16
1718192021
22232425262728
2930

Tag Cloud

                                                           
LinkShare_120x240v1

State Of The Blog

  • 3 yrs 19 wks 2 days old
  • Updated: 25 Nov 2009
  • 871 entries
  • 671 comments

Blog Hits

Total: 1,466,829
since: 15 Jul 2006

Mailing List

Subscribe To This Blog!

Subscribe in a reader

The New World Order

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” - Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950
 
"We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly-knit highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." John F. Kennedy

"Information is the currency of democracy." Thomas Jefferson

"A NEWS AND MEDIA BLOG IN THE LIBERTARIAN TENOR WITH LIMITED GOVERNMENT OVERTONES, FACILITATING THE FLOW OF IDEAS, INFORMATION, E-COMMERCE AND INSPIRATION WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF NET NEUTRALITY"
The Gross National Debt:
"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." John Adams "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is - The Fed has usurped the government!!” - Congressman Louis T. McFadden “Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States.” - Barry Goldwater

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth.....

is a revolutionary act." (George Orwell)

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"Non-Blacks Have Civil Rights?"

posted Wed, 04-22-09
Supreme Court police officers stand in front of the US Supreme ...
AFP/File
Wed Apr 22, 5:46 PM ET Supreme Court police officers stand in front of the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC. The US Supreme Court began hearing a case brought by 18 non-black firefighters that could have a major impact on civil rights protections in the workplace.(AFP/File/Manny Ceneta)

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday began hearing a case brought by 18 non-black firefighters that could have a major impact on civil rights protections in the workplace.

The court heard the first arguments in a six-year-old case brought by Connecticut-based firefighters who have accused their bosses of reverse discrimination.

In 2003 the New Haven fire department ran a series of tests for staff to see who would win promotion to captain and lieutenant positions.

But it later refused to recognize the results when it became clear no black candidates were in the running.

That prompted 17 white candidates and one Hispanic to sue New Haven's mayor, claiming the decision trampled on their rights to equal protection as set out in the 14th amendment of the US Constitution, and the Civil Rights Act. (Read Full Article)

A divided Supreme Court took up its first examination of race in the Obama era Wednesday, wrestling with claims of job discrimination by white firefighters in a case that could force changes in employment practices nationwide.

The case from New Haven, Conn., pits white firefighters, who showed up at the court Wednesday in their dress uniforms, against the city over its decision to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results.

As is often the case with closely fought social issues at the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy appeared to hold the key to the outcome. He seemed concerned that New Haven scuttled the test without determining that there were flaws that might have led to the racially disproportionate results.

"So shouldn't there be some standard that there has to be a significant, a strong showing after the test has been taken that it's deficient? Before it can be set aside?" he said.

But where Kennedy saw shades of gray, the rest of the court seemed to view the case clearly in terms of black and white.

The court's conservative bloc seemed inclined to side with the white firefighters. "You had some applicants who were winners and their promotion was set aside," Justice Antonin Scalia said.

Chief Justice John Roberts wondered whether the city could continue throwing out tests when it doesn't like the results. "They get do-overs until it comes out right?" Roberts said.

The liberals indicated that New Haven did nothing wrong by throwing out the test over concerns that it had an unintended but "disparate impact" on minorities in violation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The white firefighters said the decision violated the same's law prohibition on intentional discrimination.

A ruling against the city, Justice David Souter said, could leave employers in a "damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't situation." Souter's comment reflected the concern of business interests who said in a court filing that a decision in favor of the white firefighters would place employers in an untenable position of having to choose whether to face lawsuits from disgruntled white or minority workers. (Read Full Article)

   Because Civil Rights legislation was enacted to protect the civil rights of black Americans does that mean that non-blacks are not covered under that same Act? Discrimination is inherent in human nature and it is not wrong unless the civil rights or liberties of another are compromised by discrimination. Tests can be skewed to favor one group over another group. College entrance exams is a good example. Civil service exams can likewise be skewed to favor one group over another. As I see it, before the Supreme Court can make a fair judgement in the case concerning the non-black New Haven firefighters, the promotion test itself must be analyzed. The fact that black firefighters failed the test does not mean it was not a fair firefighter test. Let us hope that Justice Kennedy, the all important Supreme Court swing vote, will be thorough in his judgement on this issue. Look at the test! Non-blacks have civil rights too!

tags:          

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




Current News & Views Search

Custom Search

GO TO PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS FRONT PAGE FOR LATEST POSTS,

VIDEOS, PODCASTS, POLITICS BOOK ROOM,

EDUCATIONAL & INSPIRATIONAL WEBPAGES!

MORE RELEVANT CONTENT AT....