"PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"

We Are All Mo'thanskin!

"WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL; THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS; THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS"

"The answer to 1984 is 1776"

An electronic community for...

Twitter Button from twitbuttons.com

My Evolving Belief System & Profile

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
123
4
5
67
8
9
10
11
12
1314
15
16
1718192021
22232425262728
2930

Tag Cloud

                                                           
LinkShare_120x240v1

State Of The Blog

  • 3 yrs 19 wks 2 days old
  • Updated: 25 Nov 2009
  • 871 entries
  • 671 comments

Blog Hits

Total: 1,466,829
since: 15 Jul 2006

Mailing List

Subscribe To This Blog!

Subscribe in a reader

The New World Order

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” - Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950
 
"We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly-knit highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." John F. Kennedy

"Information is the currency of democracy." Thomas Jefferson

"A NEWS AND MEDIA BLOG IN THE LIBERTARIAN TENOR WITH LIMITED GOVERNMENT OVERTONES, FACILITATING THE FLOW OF IDEAS, INFORMATION, E-COMMERCE AND INSPIRATION WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF NET NEUTRALITY"
The Gross National Debt:
"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." John Adams "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802) “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is - The Fed has usurped the government!!” - Congressman Louis T. McFadden “Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States.” - Barry Goldwater

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth.....

is a revolutionary act." (George Orwell)

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

"Substantive Change Needed In Government Spending"

posted Thu, 04-03-08

How the government spends your taxes

Here's a travelogue of the journey your dollars have embarked on

By John W. Schoen
Senior Producer
MSNBC
updated 11:26 a.m. CT, Thurs., April. 3, 2008

If you haven’t already, you’ll soon sit down and sign your tax return — the annual accounting of what you owe the government. Like many tax filers, you're probably asking yourself: Just where does my money go when the government gets its hands on it?

Alas, it's not as simple a question as it may seem. For those of you who have trouble balancing your checkbook, imagine trying to keep track of where $4.1 trillion goes. That’s what was spent on your behalf at all levels of federal state and local government last year.

Even with armies of accountants and auditors, it’s hard to know with certainty exactly where your taxes ended up. For starters, you pay taxes based on a calendar year; the government spends it based on a fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. Even if the calendars matched up, the journey your tax dollars embark on depends a lot on things like how much you make, how you spend it and where you live.

Still, while the Bush administration tax cuts and the rise of the Alternative Minimum Tax have shifted the burden of who pays what, the size of the average tax bite on all of us hasn’t changed much, according to Gerald Prante, a senior economist Tax Foundation.

“The burden of government overall has remained relatively flat since 1970,” he said.

On average, about two-thirds of your taxes went to Uncle Sam last year and the rest went to your state, county or other local government, according to the folks down at the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis. (We'll use their numbers for this exercise.)

So where did your money go after you sent it off to Tax Heaven? One way to find out is to look at the government's bills. If the government sat down at the kitchen table to try to see where its paycheck went, here’s — very roughly — where it went in 2007.

To make the math a little easier, let’s assume the government made $52,000 a year — or $1,000 a week — which is about the median household income in the U.S. (The real number was $48,200 in 2006. And keep in mind that $1,000 a week doesn’t include taxes. But you’re the government — you don’t pay taxes.)

The biggest government bill last year was for a category called “income security” ($220 of that $1,000 weekly paycheck) — which includes Social Security ($115), along with other social services like welfare ($46), disability payments ($35) and unemployment  insurance ($7). The next biggest chunk went to pay for health care ($203), which includes Medicaid and Medicare.

Keeping our country — and your neighborhood — safe cost almost $200 a week, including national defense ($132), along with spending on “public order and safety” ($65), which included police ($27), prisons ($18), courts ($12) and fighting fires ($8).

Education took the next biggest slice ($158) — most of which went to pay for elementary and secondary schools ($117). Much of the rest helped pay for college ($28). About $2 a week of our $1,000 a week paycheck went to pay for public libraries.

Then there’s "general public service" — or the cost of government itself.  Unfortunately, government — like many Americans — has been living beyond its means and spending more than it collects in taxes. To make up the difference, state and federal treasuries filled in the gap by selling more debt — roughly the same as you or me using our credit cards. So the biggest single component of the $143 cost of running federal, state and local government last year was the interest on the money borrowed on your behalf ($90). Think of it as the minimum monthly payment on your government’s credit card.

The cost of running all levels of government also included salaries and expenses for the executive and legislative branches ($21) and the cost of collecting taxes ($11).

After that, the bills looked pretty manageable — but then you only had about $79 left. Those bills included highways ($25), agriculture ($8) air transport ($4), air and water quality ($7) and the space program ($3). Rounding out the list were housing and community service ($10) and recreation and culture ($7).

Like anyone paying the bills, you may be wondering: Did I get my money’s worth for the services I paid for? If you were a regular visitor to Yellowstone National Park, $7 a week is a bargain. But if you never once visited the Kennedy Center in Washington, you may be wondering: Why should I pay have to pay for that?

Some government programs are easier to value than others. A benefits check from the Social Security Administration has a pretty clear value. For other expenses, you need to consider what economists call the "positive externalities," according to Prante.

"People who don’t have kids in school still benefit from an educated populace," he said.

Like any family budget, government spending shifts from one category to another over time. In 1970, for example, health care made up roughly 8.3 percent of federal, state and local spending; last year it consumed more than 20 percent. Defense spending, which accounted for 27 cents of each tax dollar during the Vietnam War in 1970 fell to 11.1 percent of government spending by 2000, thanks to the "peace dividend" from the end of the Cold War. Since then, the cost of the Iraq war had pushed that back as of 2006 to 13.2 percent of all federal, state and local government spending.

Tallying the cost of the Iraq war raises one of the thorniest issues of the way the government accounts for your money. Depending on which agency is doing the accounting, you can find out how much has been authorized, how much has been actually spent and what the estimated total cost will be.

But simply accounting for where the money went last year doesn’t necessarily tell you how much you’re on the hook for future expenses.

"If you build a highway, you’re pretty much committed to maintain it and if a bridges collapses repairing it later," said Richard Kogan, senior fellow at The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

For a true accounting of your tax burden, you also need to consider the benefits you get from government for taxes you don’t pay. The deduction you get for the interest payment on your mortgage, for example is just as much a cost to the government as the Social Security check your grandfather gets. When you get a deduction, that cost gets shifted to people who don’t qualify for it. The tax code is riddled these with deductions, exemptions and credits that benefit everyone from college students to ethanol producers. 

"A person who looks at the pie chart of where the spending goes is going to miss the other ways in which we subsidize or incentivize other types of activity," said Kogan.

For the complete, gory details, you can statistics-geek-out at the Bureau of Economic Analysis' National Income and Product Accounts Tables, Section 3: Government Current Receipts and Expenditures. They’ve got government finances sliced and diced — by agency and function — all the way back to 1929.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23924282

   The next Presidential administration and Congress will have the daunting task of operating under the huge deficit budget inherited from the Bush Administration. Neither Obama, Clinton or McCain will be able to balance the budget in one term. The next President and Congress can only get things started on the right track. Between Clinton, Obama and McCain, Hilary Clinton is the best candidate to get the American economy back on track, if the economy is what is important to you. If change simply for the sake of change is important to you then Obama is your man. In my opinion, America needs substantive change, not a cosmetic one. Obama is cosmetic change, Hilary is substantive change, in my opinion.

tags:                    

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




Current News & Views Search

Custom Search

GO TO PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS FRONT PAGE FOR LATEST POSTS,

VIDEOS, PODCASTS, POLITICS BOOK ROOM,

EDUCATIONAL & INSPIRATIONAL WEBPAGES!

MORE RELEVANT CONTENT AT....