The capitol building exalted classical republican virtues
...a government by its citizens in mass, acting directly and personally, according to rules established by the majority; and that every other government is more or less republican, in proportion as it has in its composition more or less of this ingredient of the direct action of the citizens. Such a government is evidently restrained to very narrow limits of space and population. I doubt if it would be practicable beyond the extent of a New England township. The first shade from this pure element, which, like that of pure vital air, cannot sustain life of itself, would be where the powers of the government, being divided, should be exercised each by representatives chosen...for such short terms as should render secure the duty of expressing the will of their constituents. This I should consider as the nearest approach to a pure republic, which is practicable on a large scale of country or population ... we may say with truth and meaning, that governments are more or less republican as they have more or less of the element of popular election and control in their composition; and believing, as I do, that the mass of the citizens is the safest depository of their own rights, and especially, that the evils flowing from the duperies of the people, are less injurious than those from the egoism of their agents, I am a friend to that composition of government which has in it the most of this ingredient. |
Moth, I think you wrote a pretty fair post, but there are a couple of
random thoughts that came up while reading it. For instance, the
contradictions by our Founding Fathers that we are each guaranteed civil
liberties, except for women (who couldn't vote) and of course anyone who
wasn't white.
Michelle, your "random thoughts" are profound and I appreciate you sharing
them. Our times are different from the 18th century but the need for "the
rule of law" never changes, that is why the Founding Fathers established a
republic or a nation not ruled by a king or a corporation or even by the
majority but by 'the rule of law". The Constitution, the Declaration of
Independence, the Bill of Rights and the other amendments is the 'rule of
law" that governs our Republic. Since the Fed was created in 1913, America
has become a Fascist state or a state that is run by powerful corporations
and banks, something that is unconstitutional. The Fed and the
neoconservatives of today have already "re-invented" America into something
far from the civil liberites and limited government granted by our
Constitution. In my opinion, holding to the Constitutiona is the salvation
of America.
"The founding fathers never saw that coming."
I think alot of them did-that's why the Consititutional Convention was so
contentious. Once the Hamiltonians got Washington's ear, this country's
ideals were through. It didn't happen in 1913, Roosevelt, it happened in
1792.
Ron, you are right there has always been the advocates of a American
central bank from early in the Republic but time has proven Thomas
Jefferson right, that a Central Bank (The Fed) would not be in America's
interests. I have no illusions of the Founding Fathers being something
other than fallible men but the Constitution came from a "Higher Power"
than the racist rich men than created the American Republic, in my opinion.
How do we regain control, now that the system has been fixed for 200 years?
Nothing short of a catastrophe, environmental or economic, can help us now,
unless we all band together and say NO tothis current system of government.
Revolucion!
Ron, there is a quiet,bloodless revolution that a quiet humble little man
has ignited in America today. It's called the Ron Paul Revolution.