Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign announced Friday that his former pastor had left the campaign’s spiritual advisory committee after the pastor’s inflammatory sermons ignited fierce debate in news accounts and political blogs.
The campaign said the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., who Obama has said brought him to Christianity, was “no longer serving” on Obama’s African American Religious Leadership Committee, a loose group of supporters associated with the campaign, NBC’s Mark Murray reported.
It was not clear whether Wright volunteered to leave the committee as controversy swirled over his sermons or whether the campaign asked him to leave. Wright was the latest in a series of advisers to Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton who have stepped aside as supporters of both candidates trade racially charged accusations.
A videotape of one sermon captures Wright thunderously denouncing the United States shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In another, Wright uses a harsh racial epithet to argue that Clinton could not understand the struggles of African Americans.
The sermons, at least one of which was delivered long before Wright retired last month from Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, revived questions about Obama’s ties to the minister, whom conservative critics have accused of supporting black separatism.
“Barack knows what it means, living in a country and a culture that is controlled by rich white people,” Wright says in one of the fiery sermons, delivered Christmas Day. “Hillary can never know that. Hillary ain’t never been called a [N-word]!”
In another sermon, apparently delivered not long after the 9/11 attacks, Wright seems to imply that the United States had brought the terrorist violence on itself.
“We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York, and we never batted an eye,” Wright says. “We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is brought right back in our own front yards.”
In a later sermon, Wright revisits the theme, declaring: “No, no, no, not God bless America — God damn America!"
Obama rejects comments
The firestorm was addressed by the candidate Friday afternoon in a posting under his name on the Huffington Post Web site.
Obama wrote that he had known of similar statements by Wright over the years, which he strongly condemned. He wrote that he chose to remain in the church because “Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community.”
There was no official reaction from Clinton, but Lanny Davis, a senior adviser to the campaign, said he took Obama at his word.
“I give Senator Obama completely — completely — the benefit of the doubt that he has nothing to do with this bigotry that’s being spewed forth by this man,” Davis said on MSNBC’s “Tucker.” “For me, that’s all he has to say.
“I think we should stop this guilt by association thing because some of our supporters say stupid things,” Davis said.
But the videos created a firestorm among political observers and commentators.
“Mr. Obama obviously would not choose to belong to Mr. Wright’s church and seek his advice unless he agreed with at least some of his views,” Wall Street Journal columnist Ron Kessler, publisher of the conservative Web site NewsMax.com, wrote Friday.
Kathryn Jean Lopez, editor of the Web site of the conservative magazine National Review, wrote Friday that “now we know he’s contributed money to, voluntarily listened to, and publicly defended a cleric who peddles racial warfare.”
Others saw an attempt to "smear" Obama.
“How come righteous Republicans are rarely asked about the views of their spiritual advisers? Or why wasn’t George W. Bush (and the presidents preceding him) forced to distance himself from the anti-semitic comments of Billy Graham?” Ari Berman wrote Friday on the Web site of the liberal magazine The Nation.
Why are sermons an issue now?
The videotapes of Wright’s sermons have long been available for sale on the church’s Web site, raising questions about why they suddenly became an issue again late Thursday, NBC’s Ron Allen reported.
Recent exchanges between supporters of Obama and Clinton that have focused on themes of race and sex.
Geraldine Ferraro, the Democrats’ 1984 vice presidential nominee, resigned as an adviser to Clinton’s campaign Wednesday after she was quoted last week in a California newspaper suggesting that Obama owed his popularity to his race.
“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” she said, according to the Daily Breeze of Torrance. “And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position.”
Such attacks have been going back and forth for several weeks, even as they have been disavowed by the candidates themselves.
Last week, Obama’s foreign policy adviser, Samantha Power, a public policy professor at Harvard University, stepped down from the campaign after she was quoted in an interview with a Scottish newspaper calling Clinton a “monster [who] is stooping to anything.”
“You just look at her and think, ‘Ergh,’” Power said, according to The Scotsman.
Last month, Adelfa Callejo, a longtime Latino activist in Texas who supports Clinton, suggested that Latino voters would never accept Obama because of his race. “They never really supported us, and there’s a lot of hard feelings about that,” Callejo said.
And after Obama won the South Carolina primary, Clinton’s husband, the former president, dismissed the significance of his victory by saying it was to be expected because “Jesse Jackson won South Carolina twice.”
Advisers said Obama and Clinton were distressed by the exchanges and had agreed in a brief conversation on the Senate floor Thursday to work together to put a stop to them.
“They approached one another and spoke about how supporters for both campaigns have said things they reject,” said Phil Singer, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign. “They agreed that the contrasts between their respective records, qualifications and issues should be what drives this campaign, and nothing else.”
The Associated Press reported that an adviser to Obama, speaking on condition of anonymity, gave a similar account of the conversation.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23634881/
Mo, how much do you relate to the minister of your church? Would you hold
yourself responsible for anything your minister did or said? When I was a
young adult, my minister was someone I listened to on Sunday, but he
certainly wasn't responsible for my behavior. The way it works for most
people is they go to church and they do their thing the rest of the week.
Capt. if a person is a nominal Christian or churchgoer what his or her
pastor says is irrelevant. But is a person publicly proclaims his pastor as
his or her spiritual "mentor", if that person makes the title of his or her
bestselling book after one of this pastors sermons, if this person
constantly talks about their "good judgement" and being a "uniter", that
person and his pastor are intimately linked. I just got off the phone with
one of my sons who is a seasoned minister and Obama supporter. He admited
this pastor talked about topics in a tone that was inappropriate from the
pulpit on Sunday. My son is optimistic that Obama can "talk his way out of
this". I contend that he can't. He has now lost a significant protion of
his white supporters and some black supporters. In my opinion, Obama should
have never set up under a pastor with such divisive rhetoric, if he is what
he claims to be.
Mo, the pastor is no more important to the Obama campaign than this issue.
It's a non-issue with respect to who Obama is. If you were my best friend,
if I go out and kill someone, you're not responsible for my behavior. If
we're doing guilt by association, then none of the candidates have a shot.
Roosevelt doesn't want to back off another losing horse, Capt. :)
Seriously, aside from the obvious guilt by association problem with this
smear, there isn't much wrong with what the pastor says. And I'm a white
soldier. I may quibble with his delivery, but I'm as angry as he is and
probably have said worse in my home.
Ron, even though you are a white man now, I believe in a past life you were
Nat Turner (chuckles)!
I'd have sat with you at the lunch counter, that much I do know.